//
post
Voice and text

Thought transfer

Creative people need to be given the tools to express themselves, to vent what’s inside to the outside world. They also need to develop communication skills appropriate to their inner talents. We are all creatives in a sense. Thoughts arise in my mind and get communicated to others, to be unpacked in such a way that others think what I think and feel as I feel.

The debunking of this outdated model of communication has exercised key philosophers, linguists and media theorists for some time. It assumes thoughts get conduited from one mind to another. Here are some propositions that run counter to the conduit model of thought.

  • I sometimes don’t know what I think until I’ve said it.
  • Thoughts and ideas seem to emerge from conversations, not premeditated thoughts.
  • Thought has a strong social dimension. Communities think.
  • An architect probably doesn’t know what she wants the building to be like until she starts sketching.
  • My design comes out differently when I draw on paper, play around with cardboard or use a CAD system.
  • The medium is the message (Marshall McLuhan).

three people simulating communication via tin cans and stringWhat the mind generates is sometimes presented as a meaning. According to the conduit metaphor we package these meanings as words, drawings or actions, ready for other people to unpack and translate into meanings in their minds. The test for accuracy in communication is whether other people “get my meaning.” Noise often gets in the way to distort the signal. Contrary to the conduit metaphor, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein asserted.

When I think in language, there aren’t ‘meanings’ going through my mind in addition to the verbal expressions: the language itself is the vehicle of thought (p.107)

the meaning of a word is its use in the language (p.20).

The danger of the conduit metaphor is that it draws attention to concepts of the individual as the source of genius and diminishes the role of the social, of histories, legacies and cultures. It is also the first step towards Ayn Rand‘s selfish universe of supposedly creative and misunderstood heroes.

Whether for good or ill the conduit metaphor engenders confidence in technologies for direct communication between minds and machines (link).

Returning to noise — the signal between a sender and a receiver can become distorted; the flow gets interrupted; impurities enter the conduit. This shows the inevitable influence of the medium of passage on the message, and the crucial role of context. In fact according to certain readings communication is all context. If conduit is to be the metaphor then let’s focus on the noise.

References

  • Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought: 284-324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

About Richard Coyne

The cultural, social and spatial implications of computers and pervasive digital media spark my interest ... enjoy architecture, writing, designing, philosophy, coding and media mashups.

Discussion

3 thoughts on “Thought transfer

  1. Creative people need to be given the tools to express themselves, for the fact that they may behave strange compared to others, their ways of living or their habits are distinct, for the most of the time that they cannot be accepted by the public. They do really need a tool or channel to express their inside thoughts. Communication skills are important, too. Everyone needs to communicate with others or the world, only if the real thoughts been showed and explained well, him/her can be understood or accepted by the public.

    We are all creative in a sense, but been restricted by many aspects such as the courage to break, the expectations by relations, the authority of leaders, etc.

    Thoughts get conduited from one mind to another, I cannot agree completely. Once an idea being transferred, the receiver may enrich or improve it instead of ruined. It depends on receiver. What’s more, an architect probably doesn’t know what she wants the building to be like until she starts sketching, it is quite a same way to lots of people such as me. It is like a continuous construction and creativity, helpful for further creation, frames can be really restricted sometimes, even though chaos may appear. Last but not least, pack and unpack is crucial to communication and construction of the society.

    Posted by xiaotinghan | November 9, 2012, 12:10 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Neuroscience eclipses artificial intelligence | Reflections on Digital Media & Culture - September 24, 2011

  2. Pingback: Wet and wild | Reflections on Digital Media & Culture - March 8, 2014

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: