Automatic writing

Automatic translation is now mainstream. It’s simple enough to have text on a web site or in a text field translated between languages. The Google translate app on a smartphone combines (AR) “augmented reality” and translation algorithms to create a screen image that substitutes what’s in front of the camera with something like the same text in your own language. That’s handy for reading street signs, museum captions and menus.

It’s also handy when a non-Chinese speaker wants to see the nutritional content of food products.

Here is a photograph of the back of the pack along with its automatic translation appearing in real time as AR on the smartphone screen.

The translations are not always accurate, but they don’t need to be. Here’s something I discovered in Ukrainian, along with the app’s flickering real time translations. Click on the picture to see the detail.

This is automated translation, but it also bears a resemblance to the products of surrealist writing, literary collage, and the play of metaphor.

About Richard Coyne

The cultural, social and spatial implications of computers and pervasive digital media spark my interest ... enjoy architecture, writing, designing, philosophy, coding and media mashups.


3 thoughts on “Automatic writing

  1. Guess it’d be gratifying to know whether your Ukrainian text sample recounts ingredients, prayers, or both at once. Also, would you suppose that the ingredient: “dried mosquito fish wire” sprang from a frustrated concrete-poet-turned-product-label-writer (versus automated deformity), for that may be its destiny(?) … in all, the proportion of signal-to-noise is praiseworthy. Google Translate is perhaps more akin to shimmering locks betwixt undulating (language) seas … transmitting more-or-less bent interpretations that wriggle through shuttered gaps. If it fails to satisfy the pursuit of artefact-free translation, then it may live on as a surreal poetry engine. Which programming group deserves praise for the logical wheat, which for the poetic chaff–or is this two sides of the same semiological coin? BTW: always wonder whether you hail to “coin,” or “koi-né.” As an avid reader of the MIT book series, always feel sheepish I’m garbling its author’s name.

    Posted by Daniel Bridgman | April 22, 2017, 1:17 pm


  1. Pingback: Emotional targeting | Reflections on Technology, Media & Culture - April 22, 2017

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

University of Edinburgh logo

Richard on Facebook

Latest FB image
Or "like" my Facebook page for blog updates.

Try a one year research degree

book cover
book cover

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 517 other followers

Site traffic

  • 246,043 post views

%d bloggers like this: