//
post
Research related

The death of a public life

You can be excused for thinking that social media presents imperfect insights into human nature. US political comedian Bill Maher excoriated the public personas social media users present online — their polite, politically correct, family-friendly, “prissy” avatars, whose great “super power” is that they remember birthdays!

“If you want to know who someone really is ignore their avatar and check out their web browser history” he said with a smirk. (See the video).

There is even more to online life. Malign actors infiltrate and manipulate digital communities, friendship groups, followers and fans of key opinion leaders (KOLs). Then there’s covert advertising, product placement, rampant self-promotion, trolling, and bullying to further undermine our trust in online realities, and subvert our ambitions to always “be best”.

Against this background it’s hard to think there’s much to learn from studying public conversations between human beings, e.g. on Twitter — other than just how unreliable the medium is, and how fickle its practitioners.

Measles

Netnography 101

Not everyone agrees, including netnographers. According to marketing theorist Robert Kovinets,

“Netnography is the name given to a specific set of related data collection, analysis, ethical and representational research practices, where a significant amount of the data collected and participant-observational research conducted originates in and manifests through the data shared freely on the Internet, including mobile applications” (79).

He argues that this kind of research provides a “human window into the rich communicative and symbolic world of people and groups as they use the Internet, the Web, and social media, leaving its traces and transmissions for us to discover and decode” (80).

I agree. It’s a basic tenet of ethnographic study that all human presentations are mediated by social norms, conventions, a sense of the context in which we happen to find ourselves. Rather than the authentic self, who we really are, think of performance (i.e. acting) or role play in different settings.

We present ourselves differently when at home, with friends and family, alone, talking to the boss, on the bus, in front of a crowd, scuttling to the office. Knowing instinctively how to manage and adjust our performance according to context is a basic life skill.

It is legitimate to study what people do and say across the spectrum of everyday life, with its pressures, distortions, influences and corruptions, and under varying degrees of overt and covert surveillance and publicness. Online presentation is a part of everyday life and worthy of study.

Fountain head

One difference is that we are all newbies in the digital age. Few of us (if any) have yet mastered the subtle arts of online self-presentation, either as observers, analysts and critics, or as practitioners (i.e. as savvy social media users).

As we witness the death throes of the public life of Donald Trump (surely!) it’s fascinating to observe and recall the mix-up between the public and the private.

Statements excused in private or casual conversation shock as public statements. Followers commend the “authenticity” of someone who, unlike other public figures, speaks (or tweets) his mind. Critics decry the lack of decorum. Part of the infantilization of Trump rests on the observation that he doesn’t know how to exhibit behaviours appropriate to the circumstance.

Breaking norms is a function of art, like displaying a urinal in an art gallery. But it’s risky, and gets boring when repeated endlessly.

Bibliography

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press
  • Goffman, Erving. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin
  • Graham, David A. 2017. The infantilization of the president. The Atlantic, 11 October. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/10/infantilization-of-a-president/542613/ (accessed 24 August 2018).
  • Kovinets, Robert V. 2015. Netnography: Redefined. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth. 2018. Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are. New York: Harper Collins.

Notes

  • I’m grateful to Ezequiel Colmenero Acevedo for alerting me to the  netnography literature.
  • Also see posts: Weaponize! Full indexical jacket, and Challenges of the sharing economy.
  • The first image is a ceramic vase by Grayson Perry called “Alan Measles and Clair Visit the Rust Belt,” 2017. This side shows Trump taking the knee at the hand of the artist’s Teddy Bear, while Farage and Melania watch. Photo by author at Kiasma Museum of Contemporary Art, Helsinki.

About Richard Coyne

The cultural, social and spatial implications of computers and pervasive digital media spark my interest ... enjoy architecture, writing, designing, philosophy, coding and media mashups.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Just Google it: Netnography in practice | Reflections on Technology, Media & Culture - September 1, 2018

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

University of Edinburgh logo

Richard on Facebook


Or "like" my Facebook
page for blog updates.

Try a one year research degree

AHRC/EPSRC/ESRC/MRC project

book cover
book cover

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 323 other followers

Site traffic

  • 184,180 post views

%d bloggers like this: