//
post
Play

What’s wrong with gamification?

Can everything be gamified? (See last week’s post Gamification 101.) It already is — especially if you believe in “man the player,” homo ludens a term popularised by Johan Huizinga. The concept of gamification refers to only a part of what being homo ludens entails.

Even through the limiting lens of instrumentalized, managerialized and manipulative gamification, the elements of competition, rewards, progression markers, leaderboards, and scores pervade human social organisation.

Formal education thrives on it (grading, degree awards). Management structures award pay grades, job titles, preferred roles on the basis of performance or loyalty. In democracies, people vote for candidates, and are polled, to produce popularity leaderboards.

Limits of gamification

We don’t need to concur that these elements provide the primary motivation for people to do what they do. An article by Scott Nicholson adds that “players engage with games for an exploration of narrative, to make interesting decisions, and to play with other people” (4). He advocates for “meaningful gamification” (4) that encourages players to explore and develop their own individualised goals and motivations.

It’s not just that we seek higher grades, but the challenge of the learning experience, or the sociability of university life. People don’t just seek higher pay grades, but fresh challenges, and more interesting interactions. Voters and pollsters are not just motivated to see their candidate score higher, but expect them to bring about some kind of change if elected.

The motivational aspects of scores, rewards, and leaderboards are palpable amongst spectators and players at sports events, quiz nights and management retreats. Some articles that address just how effective in commerce and personal development are included in the bibliography.

Here’s a clip from the movie The Circle (2015) First Day In Office. The desk worker handling customer inquiries is introduced to a method for improving customer satisfaction scores. The play context of the work environment is vital for success in the firm as workers are required to participate in (voluntary) weekend social events. Everything the worker does is logged. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ByQ35OLoMM

Bibliography

  • Fuchs, Mathias, Sonia Fizek, Paolo Ruffino, and Niklas Schrape (eds). 2015. Rethinking Gamification. Lüneburg: Meson Press
  • Huizinga, Johan. 1955. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press
  • Nicholson, Scott. 2014. A Recipe for meaningful gamification. In Torsten Reiners, and Lincoln C. Wood (eds.), Gamification in Education and Business: 1-22. New York: Springer.
  • Woodcock, Jamie, and Mark R. Johnson. 2018. Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological View, (66) 3, 542-558.

Note

  • The tug-of-war photograph was taken at the Edinburgh Highland Show this June.
  • For an accessible survey of gamification in training see Apostolopoulos, Aris. 2019. The 2019 Gamificiation at Work Survey. TalentLMS, August. Available online: https://www.talentlms.com/blog/gamification-survey-results (accessed 6 October 2019)

About Richard Coyne

The cultural, social and spatial implications of computers and pervasive digital media spark my interest ... enjoy architecture, writing, designing, philosophy, coding and media mashups.

Discussion

2 thoughts on “What’s wrong with gamification?

  1. It is intriguing how these apps, processes, etc. change the language we use around certain things, and the way we think about them. I keep on being sceptical about quantifying and measuring everything, which is often accompanied by rhetorics involving efficiency, productivity, ‘goal-oriented’, leaving out of the conversation notions such as free play (without gratification), wandering around, day-dreaming, indulging in ‘purposeless’ magical everyday activities.

    Many thanks for your always thought-provoking articles!

    Posted by an_kar | October 6, 2019, 1:35 pm
    • Thanks for the comment An Kar. You reminded me of something written by my colleague Adrian Snodgrass in a book we co-authored: “‘To wander’ is ‘to go from country to country, or from place to place without settled route or destination; to go aimlessly.’6 The word relates to ‘wending’ and ‘winding’.7 To wander is to ramble, which is ‘to walk for pleasure, with or without a definite goal’. The OED says that the word ‘ramble’ probably comes from Old Dutch rammalen, ‘to wander about in a state of sexual excitement’. Even if the word has lost something with the passage of time, it nevertheless still implies going randomly, without a goal, but with an anticipation that interesting things will happen on the way. Wandering and rambling are unplanned; they are haphazard; they simply happen; they are happenings, a word not used here by happenstance. The ‘hap’ of ‘happen’ is ‘chance, luck, lot; a chance occurrence; or to come about by chance’. To wander is to give oneself over to whatever happens by
      chance.” Snodgrass, Adrian, and Richard Coyne. 2006. Interpretation in Architecture: Design as a Way of Thinking. London: Routledge, p.246.

      Posted by Richard Coyne | October 7, 2019, 7:57 pm

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

University of Edinburgh logo

Richard on Facebook

Latest FB image
Or "like" my Facebook page for blog updates.

Try a one year research degree

AHRC/EPSRC/ESRC/MRC project

book cover
book cover

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 370 other followers

Site traffic

  • 206,295 post views

%d bloggers like this: